Tycho Brahe's work has been picked up, corrected and there is a perfect working geocentric model which accounts for many (maybe all) anomalies in the current heliocentric model.
Geocentric Tycho Brahe vs heliocentric model of our solar system:
If you could show me one scientific paper where a virus was isolated and shown to cause disease a la Koch's postulates I may entertain the notion of Germ theory. Until that day comes I will stick to Terrain. It's basic common sense.
Why doesn't the Kirsch group take up Samuel Eckert's challenge?
Neither Montaigner nor Gallo isolated anything of course. It was a complete fraud. I would ask the Kirsch group and others to provide the world with the original scientific papers that Robert Gallo wrote proving the isolation of the HIV virus and how he demonstrated it caused disease. Has Kirsch or any of those claiming SARS-COV2 exists ever read them?
I can guarantee you they haven't. Gallo observed reverse transcription taking place in the brew he created and based on this then claimed he had isolated a virus. This is despite the fact they knew ten years previously that reverse transcription occurs in every cell of every living organism. The HIV scam is even more scurrilous than the Covaids although of course the consequences of the latter are far more widely felt.
I would recommend 'Fear of the Invisible' by Janine Roberts for anyone who wants to understand the devilry behind the HIV scam.
‘highly salutary,' is a very particular phrase,, that is CLINK.... CLINK handcuffed worthy, if you know who gave such Vax out the Bag, in its peculiar referencing and when! Thanks for that :)
"The human quality of feeling absolutely sure of oneself intrigues TCP."
I resemble that remark. But I have done a lot of reading of journal articles. And I am willing to consider opposing arguments and new data.
Viral purification? Not justified by cost/benefit. Isolation in cell cultures is sufficient. And we should use animal models rather than humans to prove pathogenicity.
Obviously the main objective in the purification and isolation of viruses is the separation of the virus from the host tissues and cell organelles. With some Viruses this is easy, especially if the virus particle differs markedly in size from that of the normal cell contents. With other viruses purification may be much more difficult, if for instance the virus exists in very low concentration in the host. For this reason a number of viruses have never been isolated. With most plant and insect viruses it is possible to grind up or macerate the whole infected organism and clarify the crude extract by filtration, low-speed centrifugation and other methods. With the larger animals this is obviously impossible, though in certain cases, organs, such as the brain where the virus is known to be concentrated, can be removed and separately treated."
Exosomes can be studied in cell lines, where they exist in large quantities relative to other biological materials.
SARS-COV-2 is distributed widely in infected organisms, being mostly found in capillaries. This presents problems for those attempting to purify this virus. If someone can come up with a clever new technique to purify this virus, they will likely win the Nobel prize.
SARS-COV-2 has a diameter of about 0.0001 millimeter (10^-7 meter). This means that the virion volume is about 10^-11 cubic millimeters = 10^-11 milliliters.
The density of the SARS-COV-2 virion is therefore about 0.001 gram/milliliter. Lots of biological material falls in this range, which causes difficulty for ultracentrifugation, it seems to me. But even worse is that most cellular material (like proteins) is far more dense.
CDC page 42: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted"
Very useful. The virus is, if anything the exosome, so the so-called experts have been barking up the wrong tree looking at the body's defense system and saying it's bad.
Tycho Brahe's work has been picked up, corrected and there is a perfect working geocentric model which accounts for many (maybe all) anomalies in the current heliocentric model.
Geocentric Tycho Brahe vs heliocentric model of our solar system:
Book + working model: https://www.tychos.space/
Ep123 The TYCHOS: Simon Shack and Patrik Holmqvist discuss a more credible model of our solar system https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V09MasmKxOY
Ep 154 The TYCHOS model of our Solar system https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU7Uo4JBePM
TYCHOS part 2 - Why stellar parallax falsifies the conventional Copernican model of the solar system https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4QRCn_Ny1Q
If you could show me one scientific paper where a virus was isolated and shown to cause disease a la Koch's postulates I may entertain the notion of Germ theory. Until that day comes I will stick to Terrain. It's basic common sense.
Why doesn't the Kirsch group take up Samuel Eckert's challenge?
https://samueleckert.net/isolate-truth-fund/
Neither Montaigner nor Gallo isolated anything of course. It was a complete fraud. I would ask the Kirsch group and others to provide the world with the original scientific papers that Robert Gallo wrote proving the isolation of the HIV virus and how he demonstrated it caused disease. Has Kirsch or any of those claiming SARS-COV2 exists ever read them?
I can guarantee you they haven't. Gallo observed reverse transcription taking place in the brew he created and based on this then claimed he had isolated a virus. This is despite the fact they knew ten years previously that reverse transcription occurs in every cell of every living organism. The HIV scam is even more scurrilous than the Covaids although of course the consequences of the latter are far more widely felt.
I would recommend 'Fear of the Invisible' by Janine Roberts for anyone who wants to understand the devilry behind the HIV scam.
and my humble synopsis of the work of the Perth group and demolition of HIV/AIDS theory https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/the-importance-of-intellectual-freedom
🐒
Here's my time line of social media pandemic https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/xi-and-li-and-the-great-hoax
🙏🏽
ooo yes I see a big problem with virology https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
Jo
‘highly salutary,' is a very particular phrase,, that is CLINK.... CLINK handcuffed worthy, if you know who gave such Vax out the Bag, in its peculiar referencing and when! Thanks for that :)
"The human quality of feeling absolutely sure of oneself intrigues TCP."
I resemble that remark. But I have done a lot of reading of journal articles. And I am willing to consider opposing arguments and new data.
Viral purification? Not justified by cost/benefit. Isolation in cell cultures is sufficient. And we should use animal models rather than humans to prove pathogenicity.
It should be done at least once to confirm their assumptions and is not that hard as they can isolate exosomes and bacteria phages.
To skip the technical debate, there is no proof for contagion for any so called contagious disease. Never happened in experiments like Rosenau 1918.
No contagion, no viral particle, no virus.
"Abstract
Obviously the main objective in the purification and isolation of viruses is the separation of the virus from the host tissues and cell organelles. With some Viruses this is easy, especially if the virus particle differs markedly in size from that of the normal cell contents. With other viruses purification may be much more difficult, if for instance the virus exists in very low concentration in the host. For this reason a number of viruses have never been isolated. With most plant and insect viruses it is possible to grind up or macerate the whole infected organism and clarify the crude extract by filtration, low-speed centrifugation and other methods. With the larger animals this is obviously impossible, though in certain cases, organs, such as the brain where the virus is known to be concentrated, can be removed and separately treated."
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-5876-0_3
Exosomes can be studied in cell lines, where they exist in large quantities relative to other biological materials.
SARS-COV-2 is distributed widely in infected organisms, being mostly found in capillaries. This presents problems for those attempting to purify this virus. If someone can come up with a clever new technique to purify this virus, they will likely win the Nobel prize.
Now let's figure the density of SARS-COV-2 virus.
10 billion virions weigh about 0.0001 gram. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2024815118
Each virion weighs 10^-14 gram.
SARS-COV-2 has a diameter of about 0.0001 millimeter (10^-7 meter). This means that the virion volume is about 10^-11 cubic millimeters = 10^-11 milliliters.
The density of the SARS-COV-2 virion is therefore about 0.001 gram/milliliter. Lots of biological material falls in this range, which causes difficulty for ultracentrifugation, it seems to me. But even worse is that most cellular material (like proteins) is far more dense.
They can purify exosomes and other similar sized particles.... but not Sars-cov2 or any other 'virus':
Samuel Eckert asks Swiss Prof. Marcel Tanner where is the proof of the virus isolate
https://youtu.be/bTskbrNGoFY (14 min)
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
Research summary and debunk regarding the existence of "SARS-CoV-2" and "COVID-19"
https://steemit.com/health/@johnblaid/research-summary-and-debunk-regarding-the-existence-of-sars-cov-2-and-covid-19
Leading Corona researchers admit that they have no scientific proof for the existence of a virus
https://telegra.ph/Leading-Corona-researchers-admit-that-they-have-no-scientific-proof-for-the-existence-of-a-virus-07-31
CDC page 42: "Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted"
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
https://12bytes.org/cdc-no-quantified-virus-isolates-of-the-2019-ncov-are-currently-available/
Quote from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31992387/
"We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available."
(peer review process took only 1 day, while normally is 160 days)
Is this science? No say, 22 global scientists in this retraction paper: https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
Public Health England admits sars-cov-2 has not been isolated (Aug 2020):
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/679711/response/1625348/attach/2/878%20FOI%20List%20of%20records%20describing%20isolation%20of%20SARS%20COV%202.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1
NPHET (Irish CDC) cannot provide proof the virus exists:
https://gemmaodoherty.com/investigations/live-from-nphet-which-is-unable-to-provide-any-scientific-proof-that-covid19-exists/
University of Western Australia - NO Record of Isolation or Purification of CoV By Anyone Ever!
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/university-of-western-australia-no-record-of-isolation-or-purification-of-cov-by-anyone-ever
Email exchange with the UK MHRA regarding the vaccine: “The DNA template used does not come directly from an isolated virus from an infected person”
https://hive.blog/worldnews/@francesleader/email-exchange-with-uk-mhra-exposing-the-genomic-sequence-of-sarscov2
Canadian public health officials have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification performed anywhere, ever:
https://peopleforjusticecanada.com/2021/01/05/canadian-public-health-officials-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-performed-anywhere-ever/
Even the Robert Koch Institute and other health authorities cannot present decisive proof that a new virus named SARS-CoV-2 is haunting us
https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/31/phantom-virus-in-search-of-sars-cov-2/
Dr Tom Cowan discusses which type of cells can ”grow” the virus:
https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/
Statement on Virus Isolation (SOVI) by Sally Fallon Morell, Andrew Kaufman MD, Thomas Cowan MD https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/
But read my other argumentation:
"To skip the technical debate, there is no proof for contagion for any so called contagious disease. Never happened in experiments like Rosenau 1918.
No contagion, no viral particle, no virus."
Very useful. The virus is, if anything the exosome, so the so-called experts have been barking up the wrong tree looking at the body's defense system and saying it's bad.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/e-is-for-exosomes/